Customer delivery and published evidence

Delivery experience, with evidence.

What we delivered and what was measured: the evidence behind our enterprise identity and operations experience.

AI-generated maritime concept photograph

Measured outcomes

Evidence, organised by the decision you face.

Each case sets out the decision, what was at stake, what we did, the proof and what it means for you. Results state their scope. Anonymised customers stay anonymous.

Execute a migration

Tier 1 and tier 2 banks · 2025

Four complex identity migrations and upgrades, four countries, one year.

Decision: Migrate and upgrade live customer and workforce identity estates without disrupting the bank.
Stakes: Log-in, onboarding and staff access all run through identity. A broken integration is visible to customers on the first day.
What we did: Mapped dependencies, built the target in parallel and proved compatibility, load, recovery and rollback before each cut-over.
Proof: Four complex migrations and upgrades completed in 2025, each in a different country and each at a tier 1 or tier 2 bank.
What it means for you: Migration risk can be sized and retired before cut-over, rather than accepted as a reason not to change.

How the renewal decision is made → Read the CIAM Migration Diary →

4bank migrations and upgrades in 2025

Operate a critical estate

Gaming institution · Anonymised test

1,255 complete login journeys per second.

Decision: Prove the identity platform will hold at peak before the peak arrives.
Stakes: Demand is spiky. If log-in fails at peak, customers cannot transact.
What we did: Designed and ran a one-hour performance programme under measured test conditions.
Proof: A peak of 1,255 journeys per second, 9,400 combined transactions per second and average response time under 50 ms.
What it means for you: Capacity becomes a measured fact rather than a vendor assurance.

Scope: one-hour performance test. Published April 2025.Read the performance study →

1,255journeys / second

Asian gaming provider · Anonymised tests

Resilience tested under failure.

Decision: Know how the identity platform behaves when part of it fails.
Stakes: A 1,667 TPS requirement, with recovery objectives the business had committed to.
What we did: Ran production-like trials and simulated failovers.
Proof: Sustained 1,700 TPS, above the requirement, with RTO of 10 to 15 minutes and zero data loss (RPO 0) across simulated failovers.
What it means for you: Recovery objectives are demonstrated before go-live, not assumed.

Scope: production-like trials and simulated failovers.Read the resilience study →

1,700transactions / second

Customer references

Published customer voices.

“Their accelerator and knowledge of containerised architectures gave us the confidence to choose them, a decision well made.”Alfonso Tambunan, CTO, Bank Jago. As published by Midships.

“Midships helped us migrate our ForgeRock stack from legacy VMs onto Kubernetes, a fundamental change for our team, and we were well supported throughout.”Joe Standen, Digital Experience Owner, Westpac NZ. As published by Midships.

Clients

Banks, insurers and regulated enterprises.

See the organisations we have worked with →

Discuss a comparable situation

Bring us the real problem.

Choose the conversation closest to your decision. We will show you the evidence that applies to it.

Identity renewal or migration review Governed AI opportunity review Production support discussion