Keep the rules that work
Do not replace existing successful automation.
Agentic straight through processing
Resolve more exceptions without hiring more reviewers.
Keep rules-based automation where it works. Let governed agents investigate eligible exceptions and complete those within authority. Send the rest to people with the evidence ready.
See all business case tools →
Why you are here
When the exception queue is the cost.
If these sound familiar, the opportunity is in the cases your rules cannot decide.
- Automation has plateaued. Everything rules cannot decide still goes to a person.
- Exception volumes or service-level breaches are rising. Customers wait while cases sit in queues.
- Hiring reviewers is the only lever left. Cost rises in step with volume.
- Agents could help, but nobody can sign off what they may do. Governance, not technology, is the blocker.
What changes
What happens when standard automation cannot decide?
Investigate exceptions
Gather evidence, apply policy and reason against precedents.
Resolve or refer
Complete within delegated authority, or send a prepared case to a supervisor.
Interactive explanation
Why existing STP stops at the exception
Follow the same illustrative 100 cases through existing rules and then a governed Exception agent. The original standard path stays in place.
Interactive explanation
Three applications. Three different outcomes.
See why an ambiguous case can proceed within authority, why an adverse case requires a named underwriter and why a clean application stays on the existing path.
Business owners set delegation; Icebreaker enforces runtime controls.
Explained: Going beyond existing STP limits. All explainers →
Next step
Validate the opportunity on your own cases Discuss your exception queue.
Identify a high-volume exception queue with known handling costs and decision authority. We will examine which cases an agent could resolve and which must remain human decisions.